Microsoft delays launch of Vista
The much anticipated Microsoft Vista is to be launched only in January 2007. Initially scheduled to be released in the second half of 2006, the reason behind the delay was to improve the security in the new system. It seems surprising to me that Microsoft decided to forgo the big chunk of sales by releasing only after the holiday season (Xmas in December, erm, Vista as Xmas gift?? Haha).
What does this mean to computer industry?
Most computers sales come occur in the fourth quarter of the year. Releasing in January means that there will be hardware but no software. So, what’s the point? There’s nothing the computer industry can do. They can just put their hands together and pray that people will buy computers with windows XPs.
What does this mean to consumers?
Well, of course they will have to wait for a few more months before getting new computers with Vista system. In a way it’s good for them (I think). Since usually prices may drop after holiday system since the sales at that time is usually bad. So, they may pay cheaper prices for computers than they would have originally. Haha. Then we should all hope the Vista to delay its launch longer so the price would be lower. 
What does this mean to Microsoft?
Well, its reputation would drop, I guess. Confidence in Microsoft could be at low edge. Just a few months ago, Microsoft said that it would be releasing the new system in August. And now they said it’ll be in January. Maybe a few months later, it’ll be in June. But, hopefully the delay can really make the system works better. Hope there won’t be so much problem.
What does this mean to me?
Nothing! Haha. I just bought a new laptop late last year and using Windows XP. If I were to change my system to the Vista, I think I might as well buy a new computer. Microsoft Vista requires more memory due to its cool graphic. I haven’t use Beta version but I make my assumption here based on the Vista homepage. Although it’s cool to have your desktop turned into 3D, I guess it’ll have to come at a cost. More memory required.
Popularity: 1% [?]